1962 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 501 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 501 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | 501 | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 52 L |