1962 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 605 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 501 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3270 mm |
