1962 BMW 501 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 375 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 501 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |