1962 BMW 501 vs. 2004 Kia Cerato
To start off, 2004 Kia Cerato is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 501 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Kia Cerato.
Because 1962 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 2004 Kia Cerato | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | 501 | Cerato |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |
