1962 BMW 501 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 501 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 1962 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 501 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 76 L |
