1962 BMW 501 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 501 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
