1962 BMW 501 vs. 2010 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2010 Mazda B4000 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,034 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 501 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2010 Mazda B4000.
Because 2010 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 501 | 2010 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 501 | B4000 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4034 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 74 L |