1962 BMW 501 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 315 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 501 | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2909 mm |
