1962 BMW 502 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 502 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 502 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4690 mm |
