1962 BMW 502 vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 502 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 502 | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 502 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |