1962 BMW 502 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1962 BMW 502.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 502 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 502 | Commander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2985 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |