1962 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 346 kg more than 1962 BMW 502.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 502 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 502 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
