1962 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 776 kg more than 1962 BMW 502.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 502 | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 502 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 420 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2186 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4956 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1694 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2781 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |