1962 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 60 kg more than 1962 BMW 502.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 502 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | 502 | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |
