1962 BMW 502 vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 727 kg more than 1962 BMW 502.
Because 1962 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 502 | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 502 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2137 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2857 mm |