1962 BMW 700 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1964 Singer Vogue III is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Singer Vogue III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Singer Vogue III (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Singer Vogue III should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 432 kg more than 1962 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 700 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | BMW | Singer |
| Model | 700 | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 697 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |
