1962 BMW 700 vs. 1981 Zastava 750
To start off, 1981 Zastava 750 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 700 (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 700 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 700 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1981 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 750 (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 700 | 1981 Zastava 750 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 700 | 750 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2010 mm |