1962 BMW 700 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 853 kg more than 1962 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 700 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | 700 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 697 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
