1962 BMW 700 vs. 2007 Cadillac DTS

To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700.

Because 1962 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.

Compare all specifications:

1962 BMW 700 2007 Cadillac DTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 700 DTS
Year Released 1962 2007
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 697 cc 4565 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 38 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 52 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1260 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2130 mm 2940 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.1 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 68 L