1962 BMW 700 vs. 2008 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Doblo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Doblo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Doblo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Doblo should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Doblo weights approximately 735 kg more than 1962 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Doblo (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 700 | 2008 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 700 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1909 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |