1962 BMW 700 vs. 2009 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 700 | 2009 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | 700 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |