1962 BMW 700 vs. 2012 Ford Ka

To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700.

Because 1962 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.

Compare all specifications:

1962 BMW 700 2012 Ford Ka
Make BMW Ford
Model 700 Ka
Year Released 1962 2012
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 697 cc 1297 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 38 HP 68 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 52 Nm 106 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 3630 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1260 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2130 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.1 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 40 L