1962 BMW 700 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 700 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1962 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1820 kg more than 1962 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 700 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 700 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 697 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
