1962 Bristol 407 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Bristol 407 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Bristol 407 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Bristol 407 weights approximately 377 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Bristol 407 (463 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1962 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Bristol 407 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 407 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5129 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3260 mm |
