1962 Bristol 407 vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Bristol 407 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Bristol 407 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Windstar.
Because 1962 Bristol 407 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Bristol 407. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Bristol 407 | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 407 | Windstar |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5129 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3066 mm |