1962 Bristol 407 vs. 2005 Peugeot 1007
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 1007 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Bristol 407 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2005 Peugeot 1007. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Bristol 407 should accelerate faster than 2005 Peugeot 1007. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Bristol 407 weights approximately 342 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 1007. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Bristol 407 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Bristol 407. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 1007, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Bristol 407 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 1007. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 1007. 1962 Bristol 407 has automatic transmission and 2005 Peugeot 1007 has manual transmission. 2005 Peugeot 1007 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Bristol 407 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Bristol 407 | 2005 Peugeot 1007 | |
| Make | Bristol | Peugeot |
| Model | 407 | 1007 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5129 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1243 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 40 L |
