1962 Bristol 407 vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Bristol 407 (215 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Bristol 407 should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Bristol 407 weights approximately 665 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Bristol 407 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Bristol 407. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Bristol 407 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103. 1962 Bristol 407 has automatic transmission and 2005 Zastava 103 has manual transmission. 2005 Zastava 103 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Bristol 407 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: