1962 Bristol 407 vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Bristol 407. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 Bristol 407.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Bristol 407 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Tundra. (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1962 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Bristol 407 | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | 407 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5129 cc | 4662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |