1962 Buick Invicta vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Buick Invicta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Buick Invicta would be higher. At 6,576 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Buick Invicta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Buick Invicta (325 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Buick Invicta should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Buick Invicta weights approximately 780 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Buick Invicta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Buick Invicta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Buick Invicta (583 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (220 Nm). This means 1962 Buick Invicta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Buick Invicta 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Buick Mitsubishi
Model Invicta Lancer
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6576 cc 2376 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 325 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 220 Nm
Engine Bore Size 106.2 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.5 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2070 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Length 5550 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]