1962 Buick Invicta vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Buick Invicta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Buick Invicta would be higher. At 6,576 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Buick Invicta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Buick Invicta (325 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Camry. (187 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Buick Invicta should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Buick Invicta weights approximately 401 kg more than 2010 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Buick Invicta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Buick Invicta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Buick Invicta | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Invicta | Camry |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6576 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1669 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1821 mm |