1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. (141 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Thunderbolt |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
