1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1943 Skoda Superb
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1943 Skoda Superb. (85 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1943 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1943 Skoda Superb. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1943 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1943 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | 62 | Superb |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3137 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
