1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 963 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
