1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1950 Fiat 500
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1445 kg more than 1950 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1950 Fiat 500 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | 500 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 569 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3250 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |
