1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | FX |
Year Released | 1962 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 136 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |