1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1951 Ferrari 212
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1951 Ferrari 212. (169 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1951 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1951 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1951 Ferrari 212 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | 62 | 212 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 58.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1000 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 159 L |