1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1953 MG YB
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 MG YB would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1953 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1953 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1953 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 503 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 MG YB. (79 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1953 MG YB | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | 62 | YB |
Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1250 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 79 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |