1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1954 DKW F 89
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1954 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | 62 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 682 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 910 kg |
