1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1954 Porsche 356
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1954 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1954 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1954 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Cadillac | Porsche |
Model | 62 | 356 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |