1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1956 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (122 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1956 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1962 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |