1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1964 Zastava 850 K is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
