1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Jaguar 420G
To start off, 1966 Jaguar 420G is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 277 kg more than 1966 Jaguar 420G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar 420G. (373 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar 420G.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Jaguar 420G | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | 420G |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |