1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 1969 Mazda 110 S is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1089 kg more than 1969 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 110 S |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2360 mm |
