1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
