1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1973 DAF 66
To start off, 1973 DAF 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 483 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1973 DAF 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | 62 | 66 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 32 L |