1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1975 AC 428
To start off, 1975 AC 428 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1975 AC 428.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 AC 428 (639 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 1975 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1975 AC 428 | |
Make | Cadillac | AC |
Model | 62 | 428 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 7003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 639 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |