1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1977 Ford 2000

To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (99 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 798 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 432 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 1977 Ford 2000
Make Cadillac Ford
Model 62 2000
Year Released 1962 1977
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 1992 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 150 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 90.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 77 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2055 kg 1257 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 65 L