1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 488 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 66 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3910 mm |