1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 1979 Mazda 929 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1979 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 929 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |