1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 1981 Audi 4000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | 62 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
